Baani City Center

Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive briefed about the facts of the case. Sh. Rajneesh Dutt (CRM Head), Gurvinder Singh (Project Head) are present on behalf of the promoter. After scrutiny of the reply dated 18.02.2022, it was noticed that there are large number of deficiencies which are still pending. The Authority directed the promoter to submit the deficit documents. The matter to come up on 07.03.2022.Member (Vijay Kumar Goyal)Chairman (Dr. K.K. Khandelwal)

Proceedings dated: 30.05.2022. Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive briefed about the facts of the case. Ms. Priyanka Aggarwal (Advocate) is present on behalf of the promoter. Apart from rectification of the above deficiencies the promoter is advised to submit a certificate from the concerned branch regarding submission of the annual audit report of project accounts in respect of projects registered till 31.03.2021 and QPRs of the projects of the promoter till last quarter is to be submitted.  The promoter requested for registration of the project in two phases as for Tower B, C and D. OC was obtained on 16.01.2018, accordingly, same be treated as deemed phase-I and for Tower A which is yet to be constructed and on which additional FAR available because of GRIHA is to be used is to be registered as a separate phase but completion date for the whole project will remain same as declared as per section 4(2)(l)(C)  both for phase-I and II. The matter to come up on 13.06.2022.Member (Vijay Kumar Goyal)Chairman (Dr. K.K. Khandelwal)

Proceedings dated: 13.06.2022. Sh. Rajnish Dutt (Head CRM) and Sh. Eshendra Tiwari (Manager CRM) are present on behalf of the promoter. Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive briefed about the facts of the case. The promoter needs to rectify the remaining deficiencies mentioned below: 1.       The annexures in the online application are not uploaded as well as the correction needs to be done in the online (A-H) application. 2.       Online DPI needs to be corrected. 3.       Draft Allotment letter is not as per the prescribed format needs to be submitted. 4.       Draft Builder Buyer Agreement is not as per the prescribed format needs to be submitted. 5.       Other cost as mentioned in DPI is 34.88% of total cost which seems abnormal in normal course of business. Hence, it needs to be corrected. 6.       Escrow agreement executed with the bank needs to be submitted. 7.       Financial resources of the project need to be corrected.   The coram is incompleted. The matter is adjourned for 27.06.2022.

Proceedings dated: 27.06.2022. Sh. Ashish Kush, Planning Executive briefed about the facts of the case. Sh. Rajnish Dutt (Head CRM), Sh. Eshendra Tiwari (Manager CRM) and Ms. Priyanka Aggarwal (AR) are present on behalf of the promoter. The authority directed the promoter to submit the corrected online DPI and corrected online form (A-H). The matter to come up on 11.07.2022.Member (Vijay Kumar Goyal)Chairman (Dr. K.K. Khandelwal)